sarah`s blog

place to pour your fresh thoughts!

My say on UiTM

with 10 comments

This topic could be outdated compared to permatang pauh by election. I just want to express my thoughts over what have happened lately.

As a UiTM student, I must admit that I am so thankful for being selected into UiTM. Moreover, my SPM result wasn’t excellence and I did not manage to get into public universities after the UPU result on public universities fresh intake.

 

I applied for MMU and I was offered with alpha level (similar to matriculation programme) in information technology which costs me a lot of money.

It took me a long time to decide on the MMU offer. In the mean time I tried to apply for UiTM second intake somewhere in June or July (UiTM intakes done twice per year & if I’m not mistaken it’s the only public university which intakes are done twice per year).

 

Alhamdulillah, many thanks to the Almighty Allah Ta`ala, I’d received an offer – diploma in public administration from UiTM.

 

I put a lot of effort during my 3 years diploma programme and I managed to graduate on time with an excellence result. After that I pursue to law school.

Being taught in political science and public administration as well as development administration makes me well verse with our nation’s scenario and history. Thus things are getting interesting when I can merge my knowledge with the laws. To be frank, I love reading blogs like Malaysia today, Malaysia kini and etc. it exposed me to the news that I could not get in local mainstream mass media. I‘ve been doing that since Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim’s dismissal in 1998. Lots of funny and fishy things happened. Lecturers were not hesitated to share their views in this case. Blogs supplement me with knowledge and also update me on the current issues.

 

Now, come back to the point, I’ve been studying in UiTM since 2003. I go to UiTM because I do not afford to go other universities especially private one. This is a fact which I must admit and plus I am not an intelligent student who entitled to a scholarship to go abroad then.

 

UiTM is meant for poor malays and bumiputera only. Only those who are not financially strong and do not have second chance to further their studies are the people who are entitled to get into UiTM. It goes with the history of the establishment of UiTM itself.

From my point of view, this is the idea which lies beneath the objective of Article 153 of constitution.

 

When Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim made a suggestion, I repeat, a suggestion, to open 10% places to non bumiputera as to give competitions, there were outrageous outcries from UiTM VC and students. Students marched off to MB office as to show their protests. On the night before the march, I’d been told to sign a petition of protest and to wear black shirt during the march. So the allegation of UMNO sponsoring or bribing students with black shirts is false and baseless.

 

I did not take part in the march because I knew this issue has been politicized by unscrupulous, filthy, desperate politicians.

Why? Because MB Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim wasn’t the first man to make such statement, in fact there have been a few statement made previously even from non Malay bodies and yet no protests were made.

When MRSM opened to non malay where the semangat melayu gone? Why there was no protest against Dato Nazri Aziz and Dr.M then?

And why the semangat melayu came up when Tan Sri Khalid made that statement?

 

These are the big question marks which I think are answerable through what has happened in our local political scenario.

As for the main objective of UiTM establishment which to help Malays and bumiputera to be at par with other races is good effort. This affirmative action is lawful in legal sense. However, we mustn’t forget that big names born from UiTM like Media Prima CEO Datuk Farid, Dato Zaid Ibrahim, Tan Sri Hamad Kama Piah CEO of PNB, Dato’ Salleh Majid and many more is a strong proof that UiTM managed to produce these kind of people.

 

Question of the quality of UiTM graduates are subjective in the sense that it differs from people perceptions. But I strongly think it depend on the student. If you work hard you will impress your employer about UiTM, vice versa. It happens in other universities as well, let’s be fair okay?

 

Should government intend to implement what Tan Sri Khalid had suggested, there should a thorough study on the viability of the Malays and bumiputera to face the challenge without privileges under Article 153. This issue is sensitive towards certain people, and I write this article based on my stand and not inclined to any parties.

 

As for present scenario, there are few rich and famous sons and daughters of Dato’s, Tan Sri’s, are studying in UiTM. I do not understand why they are here, since they are not categorized as poor people like me. They can afford to go to other universities. Indirectly they already grab the places of poor people who entitled to study in UiTM and deny these poor people rights.

 

And my final say is that UiTM students have been dragged into politics. Extra evidence is when Khairy Jamaluddin came to UiTM before the 12th general election with the purpose to meet Kelantanese. If I’m not mistaken the video of his speech at Dewan Sri Budiman is available at youtube.

 

As a university, it should be a place which is free from political interventions. Let us, the students be given freedom to think, observe and choose what we want. As for government, I think the effort made way back from the reign of Tun Abdul Razak is a very good effort. However, the system cannot run smoothly if people kept meddle in the system as to exploit it for their political interests as it will jeopardize the future of Malays and bumiputera and the nation, as a whole. 

Written by sara_myra

August 25, 2008 at 10:54 am

10 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. haha,i’ve been waiting for this article of your’s about UiTM merges in ur blog…
    well..hurmm….please go here and have a better perspective on the issue itself..;)

    http://harismibrahim.wordpress.com/2008/08/19/a-voice-for-uitms-minority/

    enjoy….i’ll be watching u…;)

    abu dahir

    August 27, 2008 at 6:47 am

  2. I am the last president of Persatuan Mahasiswa Islam UiTM before it was “diharamkan” in year 2000. There was so many discrimination and it was very limited chances to voice out about student movement etc. But to me, too many sweet memorable event can be memorizes when i we discuss about the “brutalism” of HEP to avoid us in involving in campus election.

    razani

    August 27, 2008 at 7:27 am

  3. uitm shall be a venue for new generations to develop and have their own thoughts.
    when we talk and argue about the whole lot of silly and fishy things, i.e things that we need to change some of them will point me as..’y r u here?go to other uni’..or ‘u r melayu tak kenang jasa or sedar diri’..indeed, a thorough reformation is crucial.tq

    sara_myra

    August 27, 2008 at 12:52 pm

  4. ’y r u here?go to other uni’..or ‘u r melayu tak kenang jasa or sedar diri’…its not only happening in UiTM..but throughout the nation itself,just the difference is,the word “Melayu” in the phrase is substituted with the word “India” and “Cina”….pity them who thinks that education privileges belong to certain groups of people only….any university should belong to students by no means of considering race segregations, who wants to reform new visionaries and love the paradigm of ideas…but then again,will it happen in Malaysia,the nation with one bangsa…Bangsa Malaysia…?

    Abu Dhahir

    August 29, 2008 at 6:38 am

  5. if u read this article you will understand more.
    http://test.chedet.com/che_det/2008/08/affirmative-action.html

    sara_myra

    September 4, 2008 at 3:58 am

  6. i wrote a lot of things on the comment column before deleting it back,because i dont think it matters when one has set their mind….go here…this article is way better(hopefully)… http://mt.m2day.org/2008/content/view/12208/84/
    and i can point out a lot of blogs,and articles way better that Chedet,but its all up to you in the end..;)

    Abu Dhahir

    September 8, 2008 at 1:30 am

  7. Think again about the past remind me about the root of all this problem. Education may just a minor topic but the more important thing is the people who control the economy. Unlike chinese(not to be a racis just refered to history) they been bought here and “pop” they got mine. not just an ordinary mine but black choal mine which is important till this day. more then less they already monoply the businnes world in Malaysia. Peopla may say that our leader is Malay but i really stand that people who control the economy is the one who give final word to policy (its happens in US too). Therefore when UiTM is born they tend to catch up the chinese in term of monoply the economy by produce Malay & Bumiputra graduate that manage to give impact and try to challange these mnopy system. I hope u guys can see a big picture. More then 60% of population in Mlaysia is Malay and Bumiputra but our total income merely covered 20% of the total while chinese with population less then 30% covered almost 70% of the economy today. You migt think that all this start with effort, but if the start with effort + financial dont you think we migt need helps too??

    xhan

    October 11, 2008 at 2:23 am

  8. i appreciate your sentiment, friend.when we talk about Malays, we are talking about a particular race which Dr.M admit as mudah lupa..and its a huge issue.i’m not pointing my finger at the system.the system is good, but the vehicle to move the system has been interfered by politicians! for god sake, why can’t the politicians help university as a good place?why have to taint it with dirty political cards?university is part of the education fraternity..( as AUKU wish it to be) and leave it alone.if political players wish to recruit students, then let all poltical players in ..then only we will have varieties ok?varieties which helps to stimulates our thinking dimension…instead of one way thinking.
    i’m looking forward to hear from you more.thanks

    sara_myra

    October 13, 2008 at 1:15 pm

  9. TQ for the comment, i agree that politician has use university to play some of their dirty political idea. However as we look further i think the whole politician is the same, either opposition nor government both of them are always play politics even the election is over for month. even though US is one of the country that i disagree a lot but they didn’t play their politics as they the government been form. yes there is election but after that, both republican or democrat helping each other to build up the nation. That why i think they are one of most successful nation in the world. What if it happen here. government and opposition helping each other in build up a nation and state. Isn’t that great??

    xhan

    October 15, 2008 at 5:44 am

  10. it would be great.however,as DPA graduate,i suppose that u are able to understand y government and opposition behave like cat and dog.my point is simple,if you want play political card,then have varieties of political card players.
    maybe i forgot to highlight something: that you cannot blame any races should you failed,be it in education or economy.

    sara_myra

    October 28, 2008 at 2:20 am


Leave a Reply